Bad cycling journalism anyone?

  • Home
  • Bad cycling journalism anyone?
7 replies [Last post]
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous

"So - I fell asleep while watching Versus' coverage of Tour of California and decided to catch up on coverage in the NY Times.

Edward Wyatt, in today's piece entitled 'During Climb, Riders Play Catch-Up,' goes on to report ""Although Leipheimer came in second at the finish line, he retained the overall lead by three seconds over Jens Voigt, a German rider for CSC....Leipheimer now looks like even more of a lock to win the overall title, barring a crash or a failure in Friday’s 14.5-mile time trial in Solvang. He will also have to get through what is expected to be a rainy 133-mile ride down the Pacific Coast Highway Thursday, a 105-mile run from Santa Barbara to Santa Clarita Saturday and Sunday’s 78-mile trip through a circuit of downtown Long Beach.""

Does that make any sense? He's locked to win based on a 3-second win over Voigt despite 3 more stages?

I know that Discovery is using this a pure marketing to herald Levi's signing, and are investing quite a bit of energy in it, but I'm not sure this is 'locked up.'"

Anonymous's picture
jmn (not verified)

"I agree. And how about Liggett's skepticism on donald's time during the prologue. If Leipheimer hadn't beaten him, we'd all still be wondering if the clock keepers were ""right"". All said, it would be nice to see Discovery win a stage.
p.s. when is the tour going to make it to the deep south?"

Anonymous's picture
Jersey Guy (not verified)
Liggett's skepticism was justified (but for the wrong reason)

Phil was wrong about the clocks, I agree. But he was right to be a little skeptical about the early times. Wind direction can be crucial in a time trial. After the prologue, many riders said the direction was more favorable at the beginning (when usually the slower riders go) than later (when usually the faster riders go). Donald rode a great ride, regardless, but he might have gained 5-10 seconds over later starters like Cancellara and Leipheimer because of the wind.

Anonymous's picture
Rob (not verified)
Bad cycling journalism anyone?

I was a small time cycling journalist and can say that the problem is money. There's so little money in cycling journalism (even in Europe) that most of the journalists are low caliber individuals with small amounts of motivation.

This isn't just annoying. It is part of the problem with things like Floyd Landis' accusation, reaction and case. It also hurts the sport when idiots like Phil and Paul get names wrong and repeat the same old catch phrases over and over again.

There are a few good ones. Check out the work that they're doing on amgentourofcalifornia.com. Eurosport does a great job too. And freelancer Alisdair Fotheringham (who wirtes for various Spanish, English and French publications) is excellent.

Anonymous's picture
tom m (not verified)
bad journalism, hardly

Let's try another view:
Levi has held the lead since the prologue. Though never more than a few seconds, Discovery team has helped Levi protect that lead up to today's time trial. Three seconds is a lot to make up in a time trial, and Jens is good but not great in the ITT.
Like all contests, the outcome is uncertain, but i'll bet a new campy chain that Levi's 3 seconds is plenty to put him atop the podium.
And nothing personal, Rob, but all the great writing from Fotheringham--and it is great--cannot match hearing Liggett call a bunch-sprint finale. Claims that he's an idiot who's hurting the sport are bit hyperbolic, don't ya think?

Anonymous's picture
some guy (not verified)
don't believe the hype about Levi

Voight has beaten Leipheimer in TTs in the past. In fact the last time they were fighting for GC win Voight won a TT over Leipheimer. See the 2006 Deutschland Tour, for example.

Anonymous's picture
tom m (not verified)

my mistake. you're absolutely right. now i'm even more psyched to watch the outcome.

Anonymous's picture
jmn (not verified)

i'm catabolic with this discussion.
let's name some dream stages for 2008 and beyond.

cycling trips